Abstract

Archaeology and the forest industry in BC were rapidly forced together by legislation in the mid 90's. The Forest Practices Code requires forest companies to search out and secure the services of archaeologists to ensure operations (harvesting and silviculture) are carried out in a manner that will avoid damage or uncontrolled alteration of cultural sites. Methodologies, standard practices, relations with local First Nations, and corresponding costs have varied substantially from project to project and from Archaeologist to Archaeologist. To meet legislative requirements, forest companies have been forced to accept these variations in order to continue to service the timber requirements of the various facilities. Legislative accreditation ensures membership standards (academic and practical experience) code of conduct, client responsibility, and appropriate discipline procedures. The end result would be a more cost-effective and professional service that would meet the needs of the client and local First Nations groups, and would protect important cultural resources.