@article {12775, title = {Archaeological Evidence in the Tsilhqot{\textquoteright}in Decision}, journal = {Canadian Journal of Archaeology}, volume = {44}, year = {2020}, pages = {155-184}, abstract = {

The 2014 Supreme Court of Canada Tsilhqot{\textquoteright}in decision provides the first declaration of Aboriginal title to Canadian soil. Aboriginal title requires evidence of continuous, exclusive, and sufficient occupation of a territory. In the earlier trial before the British Columbia Supreme Court the Tsilhqot{\textquoteright}in First Nations presented a substantial corpus of archaeological evidence to complement historical evidence, oral histories, and Tsilhqot{\textquoteright}in testimony regarding the locations of Tsilhqot{\textquoteright}in villages and the type and duration of their occupations. We examined this body of archaeological data in the context of the judicial proceedings to understand which data were considered favourably by the court and why. We found that the trial court accepted archaeological data as evidence of occupation on definite tracts of land at the time of sovereignty, agreeing with the Tsilhqot{\textquoteright}in plaintiffs that the evidence met the legal standards for continuous and sufficient occupation. Because the Supreme Court Tsilhqot{\textquoteright}in decision is the paramount statement on Aboriginal title, the treatment and consideration of archaeological data in that decision will likely set standards for and guide improvements to the applications of archaeological data in title cases.

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.51270/44.2.155}, author = {Erin A. Hogg and John R. Welch} }