<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kristján Ahronson</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Old World Prehistory and Early Canadian Archaeology</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Canadian Journal of Archaeology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">35</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">001-017</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scottish prehistory and Canadian
archaeology and ethnology were interdependent
for key figures in the history of
archaeology, such as Sir Daniel Wilson. One
way to assess the nature and extent of interconnectedness
of intellectual traditions
between the Old and New Worlds is to look
to the parallel establishment of national
museums, and key questions emerge. The
present study therefore looks to (a) ways
in which Scottish and wider European
impulses have influenced early Canadian
archaeological and ethnological collections,
such as that of the Geological Survey of
Canada, and (b) the extent to which Canadian
material culture shaped conceptions
of the British and Irish past. Grappling with
these topics leads us to be critical of simple
colonialist models of ideas and influences
emanating outwards from a central core.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record></records></xml>