<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ellen Lee</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NORTHERN CLAIMS AND CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1996</style></year></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Halifax</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In the four northern land claim agreements negotiated and signed during the 1980s and 1990s, only three include sections that deal with matters connected with culture, heritage and archaeological resources. The TFN, CYI and Sahtu Agreement all recognize Aboriginal interest in their heritage and allow for local involvement in managing archaeological resources. Only the oldest of the northern claims - the Inuvialuit Final Agreement, signed in 1984, does not include such provisions. This situation will be remedied in areas within settlement land that become new National Parks, as can be seen in the Aulavik National Park Establishment Agreement. The different ways in which these Agreements handle the assertion of Aboriginal interest, the ownership of archaeological specimens, repatriation and human remains will be compared.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>