<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Helmer, J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Resurrecting the Spirit(s) of Taylor's Carlsberg Culture: Cultural Traditions and Cultural Horizons in Eastern Arctic Prehistory</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1992</style></year></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">London</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Following the lead (though only late by some 23 years) of William E. Taylor Jr., who once argued that 'Eastern Acetic archaeology is still in its infancy.... The laissez-faire attitude towards its terminology reflects this.' (Taylor 1968:38), this paper calls for a standardization of Eastern Arctic culture classificatory terminology using the complementary concepts of Cultural Tradition and Cultural Horizon. Focusing specifically on the period ca 4500-1000/500 B.P., a pan Eastern Arctic Pre-Dorset Cultural Tradition subdivided into four Cultural Horizons (Initial, Early, Middle and Late Pre-Dorset), is defined. The advantages of adopting this systern of nomenclature for describing the major spatio-temporal division of the Arctic Small Tool tradition in the Eastern Arctic are discussed. By way of a conclusion, a complementary culture classificatory taxonomy intended to measure historically meaningful patterning and variation in Eastern Arctic Palaeo-Eskimo assemblages through both time and space is briefly described.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>