<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">White, Michael D.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Archaeological Paternalism and Indigenous Knowledge: The Struggle for Equality in Historicity</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Toronto</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In a recent article, Robert McGhee advocates the denial of Indigenous voice in the Archaeological profession, in order for our profession to continue to make significant contributions to knowledge. As an Indigenous person studying Archaeology, this statement is discouraging, particularly since I have come to the view that the past is large enough to accommodate many differing views. McGhee asserts that allowing Indigenous voices to emerge as a valid way of knowing will cause the loss of the cultural heritage of the continent. Ironically, though, I believe that McGhee's rejection of indigenous voices in archaeology could contribute to the loss of Indigenous knowledge, which in itself would lead to loss of North American cultural heritage. This paper will explore the context of McGhee's seemingly confrontational assertions through an analysis of his past works, and will advocate the alternative view that multiple voices, including strong Indigenous contributions, can only strengthen archaeological interpretation.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>